|
This piece of research is an attempt to demonstrate that designing
at a regional scale can bring legibility and contrast to the landscape.
This in contrast to the current mode of urbanization in which
designing is done at housing development scale thereby banning
from the landscape the larger dimension. This theory we examined
by way of three models. Each model proceeds from extremes in the
degree of scatter and concentration as well as from built and
unbuilt surface area. The programme is fixed in all three.
1. The concentration model combines a compact city of 230,000
inhabitants in the south of Hoekse Waard, a major island south
of Rotterdam, with a large-scale agricultural area the size of
the island of Texel.
11. The scattered concentration model consists of eleven elongated
villages one kilometre wide and each with a population of 20,000.
A necklace of parks and natural lakes is slung between the villages.
To reach a park you need walk no more than 500 metres from your
house. The house you live in has a garden and a garage.
111. In the scatter model the landscape is your garden. You live
in ribbons with a combined length of 500 kilometres. The 'garden'
is managed by eco-farmers. Businesses, glass nursery houses and
shopping malls lie in supercomplexes along the railways and motorways.
The three models have been tested against five criteria: exploitation
of the potential of the infrastructure; deployment of the large
dimensions and scale of Hoeksche Waard; whether organized to take
advantage of combinations of programmes; whether able to accept
further growth as well as stagnation; whether there is regional
orientation.
The conclusion is that 1 and 111 offer the widest perspective
for Hoeksche Waard. By placing the city of model 1 in the waters
of Haringvliet southwest of the island, the city acquires a high-powered
identity. Concentrating programmes engenders critical mass which
in turn produces new programmes and specific solutions and guarantees
a vibrant urbanity. Model 11 generates little in the way of new
programmes through its lack of a broad basis. In model 111, the
developments are contingent upon each other, making this model
extremely vulnerable where phasing is concerned. All three models
show clearly that deploying the regional scale can produce legible
schemes out of which emerge new combinations of built and unbuilt
parts.
Institution: Rotterdam
Tutors: Harm Veenenbosch, Rients Dijkstra, Dirk Sijmons, Ron van
Genderen & Harm Tilman
Specialization: urban design |